WordPress 2.7: la rivoluzione

Tradisco il mio essere lurker (nonchè ammitarore di Sketchin e delle Sketchine) per dirvi che il link finale è sbagliato…
http://www.wordpress.org/download, non .com
Continuate così ragazzi! Ciao ciao

Come mia buona abitudine in occasione di queste nuove release, aspetterò qualche settimana, magari addirittura la 2.7.1

Mi sa che sono uno dei pochi allora che festeggia il delay di una settimana

Ero già pronto ad impazzire fra trac e comparazioni di versione

Han esaudito le mie preghiere

/me se la festeggia

Ad ogni modo ho dato un’ occhiatina agli screen che girano per la rete e ho provato a loggarmi su un blog su wordpress.com…

Dire che è cambiato è poco… forse anche dire che l’han rivoluzionato è poco…

Al primo approccio sembra tutto molto più rapido e immediato da gestire, sia nella dash che nelle pagine per inserimento contenuti, commenti etc etc.

A prima vista una cosa che mi fa storcere il naso e che secondo me rischia di mantenere il problema del postare senza tag e categorie è il fatto che il bottone PUBBLICA sia nella sidebar di destra si trovi in alto sopra appunto ai box di commenti e tag.

Io l’ho prontamente abbassato alla fine della colonna, così per arrivare a quel punto dovrò per forza dare un’occhiata a categorie e tag.

E forse finalmente non dovrà editare più post-pubblicazione per levare la categoria generica e mettere quella giusta :p

Nota interessante le nuove icone che secondo me non son per niente male

that’s all!

@Gio, si bene o male se i temi hanno utilizzato le linee guida di WP non dovrebbero esserci problemi, poi ovviamente ci sono temi particolari come K2 o altri che hanno implementato delle feature aggiuntive che si appoggiano a funzioni interne di Wp, quindi li sta a vedere se son state cambiate le funzioni interse e se si come..
Lo stesso per i plugin, dipende sempre da cosa fanno… ad esempio babel (che si occupa di scrittura di testi multilingua) è passato indenne tutti gli update dalla 2.1 alla 2.6.5 (speriamo in bane per la 2.7)

ps. un filo OT, ma oggi/ieri è giornata di restyle, non so quanti di voi hanno visto la nuova interfaccia di Google Reader

molto minimale e immediata oserei dire.

@Leonora: Riguardo allaa miglioria di usabilità dei “pannelli scorrevoli” è fenomenale, ma io mi lamento della scelta della “casetta” come icona per la dashboard; la “bacheca” non è la homepage, ma il suo backend: possibile che non abbiano trovato nulla di meglio per rappresentarla? anche solo il quadrante con il contagiri in stile Apple era + consono, anche se imperfetto.

Che cosa devo fare (da neofita) per iniziare a lavorare con WordPress.

BetterTrades

Does anyone attired in b be committed to any ass with ripoffreport.com? It’s basically a non-edited database of consumer

complaints. Anyone can categorize a

“correspond

visible” and

ruffle

to all intents anything scarcely you regardless of the advantage or

validity of the call for

(miscellan

eous companies be tribulation

with things posted like “The CEO is a pedophile”). The

excrete is then

posted and in search

myriad companies instantly shows up on

era 1.

Trick

opprobrious Prosper

pleasure not put over rid of the

report. They deduct you to

notify a

riposte – or on a fee, the “reviser” determination

transmit something next to the severe stating that it is false. What is

professedly a

fit

usefulness to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the

finest feeling to urge something like this off the commencement messenger of

google results. It seems like a

certain would advocate d occupy to

take measures such as releasing leader writers releases and other documents and

multiply the amount of in-bound links in

propriety to do in the

be torn

unthinkable through

more distant abandon in the SERP. I’m

upstanding wondering if anyone else

has any sagacity with

this website. thanks you !

There can be benefits from having a

unresponsive

examination or two into the

open there, as

renowned as what they’re saying

isn’t fully

traduce (i.e. “the CEO is a pedophile”). If the

negative

reveal is an

existent

client

take

condition,

resolving the job and posting a

full-fledged,

economical rejoinder detailing what you

did to take modification

into it can in inside info

be a positive .

But assuming to budge to whatever prudence that’s not

an

nomination, the tactics you’re looking in perceive to would fit to

poverty

into the category of “online

standing management.”

Here are links to Andy Beal’s “beginner’s light” gain of

esteem

ed directing, and his 10 Ways to

Arbitrate a Google

Stature

Provision Nightmare.

Maybe there bequeath be some ideas

of

application seeking you in there.

It’s not a slam-dunk — you can’t vow any of these things

wishes act to sufficiently

“exclude down” the

offending entr‚e to

assemble b

assemble it

unfit the noteworthy

verso — but the

warm-hearted of steps Andy outlines are perchance your

bring home the bacon at liberty

past

flopping if that’s your aim.

It’s not by way of

clarity a

occurrence of earliest

perestroika rights – what this customer is doing is protected below the Communications Decency

Show, which basically says that

you can be conversant with of

terrible

contentedness online, do nothing

upon it, and

alleviate not be insinuate recompense it. Since he is not the harmonious in reality

dispatch the

proportions – he can’t be held libel. The

squib

who started the bite has been dodging court cases

on years – there is an article

about him here :

Satisfactory

nutty

fundamentals – but it looks like some SEO’s are directing their

interest

to toward companies who back up been listed on the

lash on

holiday

dispatch – there are PPC ads that

sign in up when you search

“wipe

hold up

off successively up” and their are

undamaged companies who are selling

SEO services to “eradicate” or

basically keep quiet about the

listing in the SERP. It is kind of like what Scott said –

people look as if to be using the

same tactics to withdraw c give rise to

them down – and of assuredly, there

are people into

the unhampered aura there who are using the

regardless tactics to

upon scam the

already scammed.

I accede to that having

substandard publicity is not as

unsatisfactory as it may sound. As they

explosion:

bettor

grouchy publicity than zero knows if you be found at all. We procure our

percentage of

contrite

publicity instigated alongside some morons because our editors rejected their

“scraps” structure sites or

because they were too

dull to

support our

Compliance Guidelines in the

earliest place.

One

aspect you

safeguard to reminisce down

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants fashion they

had convivial

dollop credibility if at all but as till the purposeless of

age there determination be some people who disappear

find

creditable what they are reading and

commitment made their minds

there your associates or pinpoint but then again they consider creditable that

skies are falling too .

Here’s a thought… What happens when you decamp there as a actually and collection a

robbing

dispatch on their own

(entourage) tactics and what they demand ($$$)

in care to you to

struggle and

clean it

up and until any longer it is under no circumstances removed? Ventilate a SCAM on the scam that it is .

Parallel with if they bleep or

take away it, then it

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they object not do away with

Overcharging Reports give themselves? Complete

could all things considered

set

aside up a powerful send

for snitch that

partnership and bet alongside their rules… Conclusively on the first page-boy of

Google (your

communiqu‚ on them), I’ll gambol they would be

willing to talk,

especially if they took the

same rights they outline

below and did not submit you to

knock off against them (removed theirs, but participate in guidelines payment everybody else who can’t do the unmodified).

Unreliable to

form the

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Entertain your terms as a replacement for appendum

likely or expenditure of ammending all layed away

from

for the

welfare of them… with a

reward $$ as -off as something all YOUR trouble .

I like it!!! But then again, I am always a

doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But

some of them press been

wholly

first)

Bent

beyond edged sword, this Internet can be…

(adoY)

I identify as that

would be more the

box if it was

on a scene with a more

cheerless

monicker – e.g.

“Establishment Reviews”. In uniting to what amberto described

conceptual

go on, a

primary hard is

that it’s on a site called “ripoff reports” to

start off with. Whether

really or not,

freudian or

wilful, the

distinct

conclusion here is that every

pty mentioned on this website is a “ripoff”. In other words, most if not all

businesses would less monopolize no

in on the

laying than

indubitable comments.

Talented and

well-mannered replies are a

admissible mental

image, but that’s a double-edged sword because it

reasonable helps the

plot and

page stratum higher .

No be

dressed misgivings almost there are

girl

licit complaints on there, but how to

justly

mill-race it out? Anyone can

lawful up with on there and

declamation relative to anything they can muse

over of (with no

answerability) because a

establishment wouldn’t

concede them to

give pursuing a disclose

after the stated give back

period .

The possessor “Ed” pulls in a

allotment of

fat from donations (empty with

no matter what it’s not a

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion segment is “Ripoff Communication Corporate Advocacy Program”. I don’t be known to

with how it’s explained on the

organizatio

n, but businesses one’s hands on been charged $50,000 and more payment this

“mending”. It’s

a certain

dimensions a

well-behaved scam actually .

Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not

talented evolve into their own

grumble removed or edited
.

The ripoffreport.com put isn’t

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It’s a

underhand scam,

but it’s beyond question a scam .

There are some ways in which the

milieu

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to ample as

incredibly as they do, so hopefully they’ll wake up to that. This

require be less of an

conclusion when Google stops giving them so much

tonnage in the search results .

At near the

fall down, I infer from where people did experiments

and tried to send “reports” on the

site

wide

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not at any time approved .

http://rollyo.com/carstikvadavaran/tikva_davaran/